Autonomous agents that monitor adverse event signals across literature, social media, and regulatory databases. Signal detection, triage, and case filing preparation.

Life Sciences AI
Pharma and biotech operate in the same regulatory neighborhood as our 15-year healthcare IT practice. GxP, 21 CFR Part 11, and FDA AI guidance aren't new territory for us.
Regulated AI in life sciences
In life sciences, every AI system touches a validation requirement. From GxP-qualified infrastructure to FDA submission documentation, the compliance architecture isn't a layer you add later — it's the foundation you design from. Our work in adjacent regulated environments means we build that way by default.
GxP and FDA requirements
Where AI creates value in life sciences
Automation of regulatory submission preparation workflows — IND, NDA, 510(k). Document compilation, gap analysis, and review facilitation.
RAG architectures for scientific literature — PubMed, clinical trial registries, internal research. Systematic review support, evidence synthesis, and competitive intelligence.
AI-assisted analysis of clinical trial data, protocol deviation detection, and patient population insights. Always within the GxP validation framework.
21 CFR Part 11 compliance for AI systems handling electronic records. GxP validation frameworks. FDA AI/ML guidance alignment. The documentation that makes AI defensible in regulatory submissions.
Validation of AI systems in regulated research and clinical contexts. Evaluation harnesses, adversarial testing, and the documentation trail that GxP environments require.
Book a life sciences AI conversation — validation and compliance from architecture to submission.
844.PROTICOM
proticom.ai